Site Overlay


Edward Leedskalnin bases his unified field theory on detailed observations he made from direct experimentation with magnetism and electricity. Leedskalnin. Title: Magnetic Current (Illustrated), Author: Miocom Co., Name: Magnetic Current (Illustrated), Length: Edward Leedskalnin Illustrated book Rock Gate, As always the search for clues continues.. how did Ed Leedskalnin quarry .. I illustrated this at the same time as magnetic current, years ago.

Author: Gashakar Mikall
Country: Burkina Faso
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 13 August 2013
Pages: 162
PDF File Size: 12.51 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.49 Mb
ISBN: 615-3-83550-354-2
Downloads: 69637
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mill

Poole and ED’s “Astronomical Model”. Another great video by R. And the orientation illustratwd the PMD poliarity and its connection to the flywheel. Magnetic Motors and Generators. What was ED’s flywheel?

Does the capacitor play any part? This also reminded me of Eds flywheel at rock gate. You can also do this experiment if you have access to a 3D printer. Inside a microwave oven is a magnetron it helps generate microwaves curreht emitting electrons? We know a microwave works but are we misunderstanding how it really works maybe Ed would think so. Normally whether magneitc be a generator or a battery, the positive terminal will have to be connected to the negative terminal, but in the vacuum tube two batteries with different strength were used, the smaller battery was connected normally, but the larger battery’s negative terminal was connected to the smaller leesskalnin negative terminal, and the positive terminal was left alone.

That connection gave the negative terminal a double dose of strength, and so it became hotter and could push more. It was called cathode and the positive terminal anode. And the electricity that passed from the cathode to the anode was called electrons.

Magnetic Current

Stones Leedsmalnin not Cut? As always the search for clues continues. He believed it was possible to create a machine that generated perpetual motion and power. He has also written about understanding how acid works to dissolve matter. Joseph Davidovits a French materials scientist holds a theory that some of the blocks in egypt where not cut but created “cast” onsite.

Have a look at this site to read more. On the other hand the Cheops and Teti casing stones are limestone consisting of: The pyramid casing stones are light in density and contain numerous trapped air bubbles, unlike the quarry samples which are uniformly dense.

If the casing stones were natural limestone, quarries different from those traditionally associated with the pyramid sites must be found, but where? X-Ray diffraction of a red casing stone coating is the first proof to demonstrate the fact that a complicated man-made geopolymeric system was produced in Egypt 4, years ago.

For Davidovits, Imhotep is actually the inventor of working with agglomerates, or geopolymers. Machining Stones in Egypt. I have been still thinking about the stone markings at rock gate and in ancient cities around the world. Have at look at the video from 3: He is convinced a large machine was used to cut the stone. Clues between Inca walls and Rock Gate. What is acid and what gives acid the ability to take the other matter in parts?


For instance Zinc, acid and the bubbles that are coming out of the Zinc are held together themselves by the same kind of North and South pole magnets, and why acid which is one kind of matter leedskaalnin take another kind of matter in parts. The acid atoms must have a smaller orbit and few magnets in it than the other matter it takes in parts. Many stones show strange impressions or scrape marks, as if the surface has been soft during tooling.

Now if you read one of my earlier posts I questioned similar markings on the walls at Rock Gate. The reason Im posting this experiment leedskapnin particular is because that aluminium block looks so much like one of Ed Leedskalnin’s cut stones from coral castle Rock Gate.

Below it is a copper plate. Watch how softly it lands illustratdd pushed to fall. The stones at coral castle “Rock Gate” are marked with this pattern. Well at least the ones leedskwlnin the walls. Did ED use these metal bars in some way? The pattern seems to only be on one side of the rock from what I can see.

The markings almost look like they have been melted in? They are said to be caused by the refraction of light. Again it kind of reminds me of what ED said about magnets passing as a concentrated stream through a small space.

These are whats commonly called light pillars. But Since light is also part of the electromagnetic spectrum, maybe something else is happening here? There is always talk of how ED moved or lifted the stones. How about the question “How did he cut them out? History Channel, Coral Castle. History Channel series Ancient Aliens. You can also see some lines markings on the ground that match the walls or stones.

Magnets are hitting the radio waves.

There are also rumours that ED only worked at night, he talked about radio waves and he also said “Magnets that are coming down from the sun are hitting the radio waves across, and so disturbing their paths. That is the reason why we cannot hear the radio as well in the day time as we do at illkstrated.


I illustrated this at the same time as magnetic current, years ago. He measured the suns movement and did his calculations.

Really, they are two currents. Since then some very good educational videos have shown up on youtube from Magnetic Universe. So its almost another year, and its been a long time since I made any posts. I have had some comments regarding why I only posted some ollustrated from ed’s other papers. I currebt more diagrams to his writings. So some more of this will be posted, as well as a revised version of Magnetic Current with corrections.

Magnetic Current: Magnetic Current Illustrated

There will be an illustrated book of Magnetic Current with clear pictures and text for sale. Electrons by Edward Leedskalnin. As you can see in my diagram this is complex experiment involving 2 batteries a vacuum and the results were labeled anode, cathode, and electron and proton. In a permanent magnet north and south poles are equal in strength. And there is no need to push magnetism through a vacuum to prove it exists. So what did this experiment really prove?


Perhaps the particles of matter that were pushed out of the vacuum “rays” existed, due to the force of the current of north and south pole magnets moving in high speed against each other. The electron is a subatomic particle carrying a negative electric charge.

It has no known components or substructure. The word electron actually comes from the Greek word for ‘amber’. When amber was rubbed against an object such as fur it would display electro static capabilities.

For those that don’t know, Nathan B Stubblefield was an American inventor There are claims that he was the inventor of wireless telephony. Gives new meaning to earth hour. Its been a while since I last posted, my apologies just stumbled upon this demonstration of ED’s Perpetual Motion Device and magnetic current theory.

It would be great if these experiments showed which direction east is and how the prongs are aligned. The coils are also covered with foil on the outside which is different to ED’s descriptions. PMD demonstration with one coil. This is a great example of ED’s research that once you start the leedskalnni flowing in this device they will continue to circulate illustrsted the leedskaknin bar is removed.

Notice how only one terminal of the battery is connected and the other is only tapped. This shows that only a small amount passed into the PMD holder and it has the ability to hold it.

It is also a great learning tool. Just remember Ed was very specific in his directions on how to construct his holder. Many people make little horseshoe electromagnets and call them a perpetual motion holder. Ed tells you exactly what steel stock to use, wire type and size, how many turns, dimensions, spool material, etc. Voltmeters and Ampere meters are one-sided.

They only show what is called by instruction books, positive electricity, but never show negative electricity. Now you can see that one-half of the electricity escaped their notice. If the researchers had used the same kind of equipment I use to demonstrate what magnetic current is, they would have found out a long time ago what electricity is.

The positive electricity is composed of streams of north pole individual magnets, and negative electricity is composed of streams of south pole individual magnets. They are running one stream of magnets against the other stream in whirling right hand twist, and with high speed. Daily News, Miami, Florida. ED’s theory does make a lot of sense when he describes why he thinks the atom drawings he has seen are wrong.

I’ve decided to post them, to at least spark more comments or feedback.